Search results for "art. 6 CEDU"
showing 4 items of 4 documents
Appello (evoluzione)
2014
La voce analizza l'istituto dell'appello penale nella fisionomia attuale nonché nella interpretazione che dovrebbe scaturire dall'orientamento europeo dopo le pronunce di condanna degli ordinamenti che non hanno garantito il rispetto del diritto al contraddittorio in caso di ribaltamento dell'esito liberatorio del primo grado. Infine si tenta una possibile soluzione normativa per allineare il giudizio di secondo grado alle linee guida fissate in sintonia con i dritti della Cedu.
Mancato contro-esame dei testimoni a carico e iniquità del processo penale
2022
This is a note to the judgment in the case Faysal Pamuk v. Turkey (application no. 430/13), rendered by the European Court of Human Rights. The contribution explores the violation of Article 6 §§ 1 (right to a fair trial) and 3 (d) (right to obtain attendance and examination of witnesses) of the European Convention on Human Rights. The case concerned Mr Pamuk’s trial on terrorism-related charges, in particular the use of evidence that had been given in other jurisdictions in the absence of Mr Pamuk or his counsel following letters of request. The Court found in particular that letters of request and examining witnesses in other jurisdictions could not be considered an adequate method of ens…
Il diritto di difesa degli staff member nei sistemi di giustizia interna dell'Organizzazione Internazionale del Lavoro, dell'Organizzazione delle Naz…
La Corte EDU si pronuncia sulla perseguibilità dei reati commessi dalle vittime di tratta
2021
The note to judgment deals with the case of V.C.L. and A.N. v. the United Kingdom (applications nos. 77587/12 and 74603/12), in which the European Court of Human Rights considered for the first time the relationship between Article 4 (prohibition of forced labour) of the European Convention and the prosecution of potential victims of trafficking. In doing so, the Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 4 and of Article 6 (right to a fair trial), since, despite the existence of credible suspicion that V.C.L. and A.N. had been trafficked, neither the police nor the prosecution service had referred them to a competent authority for assessment. For its judgment, the Co…